I didn’t spot any reference to Dembski or Marks in the Wikipedia article on bioinformatics. There is an article about it on evolutionnews which uses terms like “adorable”, “long outdated” “grounded in 1970s assumptions,” …. To my surprise, I cannot find a Dembski/Marks review of the program. There is also Biomorphs originally invented by Dawkins in response to the “target” criticism. If Marks is making stuff up about TIERRA I would like to know. I’ll see if I can find anyone working in bioinformatics is using it, or whether biological models have evolved from the original. Alan Fox Regarding TIERRA, I suspect those interested download the program and work with it on their own systems. It may take a day or two for me to get inquiries posted and a few days more for responses to come in. A link would be handy if no trouble Alan Fox Please keep me posted.Sure. hnorman42 Did you check the religion section of bioinformatics?I don't see that section in the Wikipedia entry on bioinformatics. I'm kind of surprised that I can't find any discussions of possible relationships between biomorphs and pareidolia online.
I’ll see if I can find anyone working in bioinformatics is using, or whether biological models have evolved from the original.Īpologies to Origenes.
A reader notes that Davies says at 37m30s: “What life makes is consistent with physics and chemistry, but is not dictated by physics and chemistry.” Well, by a process of elimination, doesn’t that leave information? Design? And how are things designed without intelligence? At this point, one can only say, Keep talking.
0 kommentar(er)
